This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
Privacy Overview
Strictly Necessary Cookies
Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.
If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.
3rd Party Cookies
This website uses Google Analytics to collect anonymous information such as the number of visitors to the site, and the most popular pages.
Keeping this cookie enabled helps us to improve our website.
Please enable Strictly Necessary Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!
Director's Statement
In the 60s and 70s, when political terrorism rose in Western Europe, Israel was socialist, basically egalitarian. Today, Israel has the widest economic gaps in the Western world. Class conflicts are shadowed by the conflict with the common enemy − the Palestinians. But, below the surface, a rage and a feeling of abuse are boiling. In POLICEMAN they mature to an eruption, strangled by a force greater than itself. I tried to create a collision between two groups, each an expression of one of the conflicts − the national and the socio-economical. The routine of the policemen of the elite unit is the clash with the ‘Palestinian enemy’. Their virility and their readiness to fight is the expression of a country in which the sidewalks and coffee houses are filled with men who have fought in wars and killed. They are confronted with a small group of young radicals. They kidnap three Israeli billionaires during the wedding of the daughter of one of them. They are ready to kill or to be killed in order to free society from the oppression the majority sees as a normal life. Members of both groups share a combination of great naivety and great violence. Both of them lack complexity outlook and dialectic view. They are prisoners of their own values, of their own truth, of their own moral system, of their own existence. Ignoring the existence of the other enables the violence towards the other − physical violence in the policemen, rational violence in the revolutionaries.