This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
Privacy Overview
Strictly Necessary Cookies
Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.
If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.
3rd Party Cookies
This website uses Google Analytics to collect anonymous information such as the number of visitors to the site, and the most popular pages.
Keeping this cookie enabled helps us to improve our website.
Please enable Strictly Necessary Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!
Director's Statement
In the post-Soviet countries, the first association with the army is hazing, or “dedovshchina” - an informal hierarchical practice of violent bullying and sometimes deadly abuse of junior conscripts historically in the Soviet army. The term dedovshchina is derived from "ded" (grandfather in Russian), meaning soldiers after their third half-year of compulsory service, and thus it can literally be translated as "rule of the grandfathers". This is essentially an informal system of seniority based on stage of service, not backed by code or law.
In 2016, according to the official statistics, 1000 soldiers died in former Soviet countries in peacetime: 16 of them from the Belarusian army. Most of the cases were officially presented as suicides. Men who were both victims of violence and practiced it in the army return deeply traumatized and extend violence to other spheres of life, mainly to their family.
Moreover, the violence in the authoritarian society is generally rooted in the violence in the military service, which is obligatory for the majority of male population of post-soviet countries. That leads to massive tolerance towards the violence in our societies.
Men who return from the army often cannot find themselves in civil life, finding jobs in militarized structures, like security services or the police. The political crisis that started in Belarus in August 2020 showed the relevance of our topic in wider context: violence that originates behind the doors of military units flooded out onto the streets and was used by the authoritarian government to suppress peaceful protests.
The country saw an unprecedented outbreak of violence by security forces, including shooting at unarmed demonstrators (some of whom were killed), arresting thousands of people, and mass beatings and tortures of detainees. The tortures and humiliations used against protesters were similar to the violent practices inside the army. While the brutal repressions in Belarus continue, the results of the violent military system are visible in much more shocking and enormous extent during the Russian invasion into Ukraine with the terrifying war crimes including bombing civil targets, mass killing of civil population, gang rapes, tortures, etc.
One of the reasons the invasion of Russia became possible with the use of Belarusian territory, was the defeat of Belarusian protests. Belarus, being independent on paper, remained the satellite of Russia and this situation was internationally accepted.
What we question is the responsibility of our society that stays mostly silent and tolerates the culture of violence. Although everyone knows about the violence and hazing in the army, the tragic cases that ended in death were hidden by the military; the families of the deceased were afraid to speak up. The case of Sasha, who was found hanged in the army, became public for the first time in Belarus thanks to his mother, Svetlana’s, efforts. It had a huge effect - immediately after, other mothers also tried to speak publicly about the deaths of their sons in the army. But during the trial on Sasha’s case, we were struck by how his fellow soldiers justified the commanders’ and old-timers’ hazing and considered this a normal practice.
However, we can see how society and its perception of the army, violence and hazing has moved towards change, motivated by Svetlana’s efforts and ended up with the mass protests.
Our film explores the violence in the army and in the society, the social norms that are behind it, and their transformation. The film also confronts the concepts of responsibility, fear, loss, and sorrow as we are searching for the starting point of the cycle of violence.
While it’s common to talk about the consequences of violence, we are focusing on the causes. We'd like to emphasize once again that we are sharing the idea of the responsibility of the society and the individual. During our journey to the roots of violence we are aiming to stay sober and avoid any justification of the army or soldiers that are implementing brutal practices. We believe that the film will make an essential input in changing the popular attitude towards the culture of violence.