This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
Privacy Overview
Strictly Necessary Cookies
Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.
If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.
3rd Party Cookies
This website uses Google Analytics to collect anonymous information such as the number of visitors to the site, and the most popular pages.
Keeping this cookie enabled helps us to improve our website.
Please enable Strictly Necessary Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!
Director's Statement
We cannot find words succinct and effective enough to describe the theme we want to tackle in our second, very ambitious project. This is also why we chose the audiovisual medium of film to tell the story, rather than relying on writing alone. Writing is too precise. Unequivocal. It wasn’t enough for this story. There is a lot of silence in our film. And when the characters do speak, paradoxically, they may communicate less. Uneasiness, solitude and apprehension find their primary locus within the families in this story. The home – what used to be a nest, although a tenderly limiting one – is now the nexus of intolerance, coldness and anxiety. It is enough to consider the number of domestic murders to realise that this is true. We want to investigate, in the most original way possible, the communication breakdown in these families, immersed in the stagnant flow of sterile routines, where perhaps only tragedies have the capacity to shake things up. Normal families that speak to everyone, without the excuse of being ‘marginal’ or being at the reassuring distance of the ‘bourgeoisie’. A "Spoon River" for the new millennium, that speaks to both American suburbia and the European welfare state. We believe that the script really communicates a sense of palpable suffering. It doesn’t just recount suffering, it embodies it. In one powerful, ancestral form: the fable, metaphor par excellence. A dark fairy tale that relates the worst aspects of a form of capitalism that does not belong to us by culture or tradition but which, as (provincial) citizens of the world, we somehow feel we deserve. A story with complex content which we combine with a striking, scornful, iconic mise en scène, far from the realism of BOYS CRY, transfiguring the present-day into timeless cinematic language. This story could have emerged from the pages of Updike, Vonnegut, Yates, Ibsen – or obviously, from the collected works of the Brothers Grimm, archetypes of this film, beginning with the title. A world of sensations, colours and odors; yet in the distance, everything is burning. As in every self-respecting fairytale, there is a narrator to spell out events. A mocking narrator who likes to shuffle the cards, to toss ambiguity into the most normal gesture and to normalize the inhuman. Every film is a dream, after all. BAD TALES is about a broken dream: The shattered dream of a generation of young men and women who imagined their future with a sense of hope that has proven to be in vain. And their children, who don’t want to go anywhere near their own future. Faithfully yours, The D’Innocenzo Brothers