This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
Privacy Overview
Strictly Necessary Cookies
Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.
If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.
3rd Party Cookies
This website uses Google Analytics to collect anonymous information such as the number of visitors to the site, and the most popular pages.
Keeping this cookie enabled helps us to improve our website.
Please enable Strictly Necessary Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!
Director's Statement
While writing the script I took as my inspiration the historical characters of Heinrich von Kleist and Henriette Vogel, but without intending to produce a biographical account; I am much more interested in telling a story about the ambivalence of love, a story with more general validity. The historical setting permits me to tell the story from a distance, and despite the serious subject (double suicide) this also allows a certain laconic humour to be employed. As well as this, the historical context lends the film an interesting multi-faceted quality; one expression of this comes in the dialogues about the administrative reforms in Germany during the years 1810 and 1811. On the one hand these reforms reflect the powerful social and political upheaval taking place at the time, so they help solidify the epoch which is depicted in the film. At the same time the reforms are associated with a certain confusion or contradiction, and I am interested in portraying this: there were apparently very different opinions on these proposed reforms, each plausible in its own way, ranging from fervent support to vehement opposition. This is typical for a period of uncertainty, when it is difficult to know where to take a stand - and this theme runs through the whole film, which aims to present contradictory truths that exist at the same time, precluding an unambiguous response that dispels all doubts. The subjectivity of each standpoint is revealed, and this makes it impossible – in a time of paradigm shift – to understand exactly what is right or wrong.